·Î¹öÆ® ÄÚÅ©¶õ(Robert F. Cochran, Jr.)
ÆäÆÛ´ÙÀÎ ·Î½ºÄð ºê·£´ÙÀ̽º ±³¼ö. ÄÚÅ©¶õ ±³¼ö´Â Åä¸Ó½º ½¦ÆÛ¿Í °øµ¿ Àú¼úÇÑ Lawyers, Clients, and Moral Responsibility(1994), Á¸ µðÇÇÆÄ‧¸¶»ç ÇÇÅÍ¿Í °øµ¿ Àú¼úÇÑ The Counselor at Law(1999)ÀÇ ÀúÀÚ´Ù.
¶Ç ±×´Â Journal of Legal Education 1È£(1997)¿¡ ½Ç¸° ¡°¹ý·ü°ú ¹ýÇп¡ °üÇÑ ±âµ¶±³Àû °üÁ¡ ¼·Ð¡±(Introduction to Christian Perspectives on Law and Legal Scholarship)À» Æ÷ÇÔÇØ 20°³ ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¹ýÇÐ ¸®ºä¸¦ ½è´Ù.
¾ØÀý¶ó Ä«¸á¶ó(Angela C. Carmella)
¼¼Åæ Ȧ ·Î½ºÄð ±³¼ö. Ä«¸á¶ó ±³¼ö´Â The George Washington Law Review 60È£(1992)¿¡ ½Ç¸° ¡°Á¾±³ÇàÀ§ÀÇ ÀÚÀ¯ ¹ý»ç»ó¿¡ °üÇÑ ½ÅÇÐÀû ºñÆò¡±(A Theological Critique of Free Excercise Jurisprudence), Notre Dame Law Review 73È£(1998)¿¡ ½Ç¸° ¡°Á¾±³ÀÇ ÀÚÀ¯¿¡ °üÇÑ ¸Þ¸® ¾Ø ±Û·»´øÀÇ ÀúÀÛ: Àΰ£ÀÇ »çȸÀû º»¼º°ú Á¾±³ÀÇ °øÀû º»Áú¡±(Mary Ann Glendon on Religious Liberty: The Social Nature of the Person and Public Nature of Religion) µîÀ» ½è´Ù.
1988³âºÎÅÍ ±âµ¶±³±³È¸ÇùÀÇȸ ¼Ò¼Ó Á¾±³ÀÚÀ¯À§¿øÈ¸(Religious Liberty Committee of the National Council of Churches) ±¸¼º¿øÀ¸·Î ÀÏÇß°í, 1997³âºÎÅÍ´Â °¡Å縯Áö½Ä¹®ÈÀ§¿øÈ¸(Catholic Commission on Intellectual and Cultural Affairs)¿¡¼µµ ÀÏÇß´Ù.
Á¦¶óµå ºê·¡µé¸®(Gerad V. Bradley)
³ëÅ͵¥ÀÓ ·Î½ºÄð ±³¼ö. Church-State Relations Today(1987), ·Î¹öÆ® ¹è¸®¿Í °øµ¿ ÆíÁýÇÑ Set No Limits(1992), Äɳ׽º ±×¶ó¼Ò‧·Î¹öÆ® Ç寮¿Í °øµ¿ ÆíÁýÇÑ Catholicism, Liberalism, and Communitarianism(1995) µîÀÇ Ã¥À» ½è´Ù.
±×´Â ¶Ç Á¸ ÇǴϽº¿Í ÇÔ²² The American Journal of JurisprudenceÀÇ °øµ¿ ÆíÁýÀÚ¸ç, °¡Å縯±³¼öȸ(Fellowship of Catholic Scholars)ÀÇ È¸ÀåÀÌ´Ù.
¸¶½Ã ÇØ¹ÐÅÏ(Marcy A. Hamilton)
¿¹½Ã¹Ù ´ëÇÐ º¥Àú¹Î Ä«µµÁ¶ ·Î½ºÄðÀÇ Åä¸Ó½º ¸® °ø¹ý ¼®Á ±³¼ö. ÇØ¹ÐÅÏ ±³¼ö´Â 2000-2001³â ´º¿å ·Î½ºÄðÀÇ ¹æ¹® ±³¼ö¿´´Ù.
ÃâÆÇ¹°·Î´Â William and Mary Law Review(2000)¿¡ ½Ç¸° ¡°ÀÚÀ¯·Î¿î? Çà»ç¡±(Free? Exercise), Law and Contemporary Problems 63È£(2000)¿¡ ½Ç¸° ¡°Á¾±³¿Í Ŭ¸°ÅÏ ½Ã±âÀÇ ¹ý: ¹Ý¸Åµð½¼ÁÖÀÇÀÇ À¯»ê¡±(Religion and the Law in the Clinton Era: An Anti-Madisonian Legacy), Connecticut Law Review 31È£(1999)¿¡ ½Ç¸° ¡°¹Ù¿ìó, Á¤±³ºÐ¸® Á¶Ç×, ±Ç·Â¡±(Vouchers, the Establishment Clause, and Power)°ú ¡°ÀÀ´ä¡±(Reply), University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Journal 20È£(1998)¿¡ ½Ç¸° ¡°Á¾±³ÀÇ Çå¹ýÀû ¼ö»çÇС±(The Constitutional Rhetoric of Religion) µîÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù.
µ¥À̺ñµå Ä¿µô(David S. Caudill)
¿ö½ÌÅϾظ® ·Î½ºÄð ±³¼ö. ÃâÆÇ¹°·Î´Â Lacan and the Subject of Law: Toward a Psychoanalytic Critical Legal Theory(1997), ½ºÆ¼ºì °ñµå¿Í °øµ¿ ÆíÁýÇÑ Radical Philosophy of Law: Contemporary Challenges to Mainstream Legal Theory and Practice(1994), Law, Belief, and Criticism(1989)°ú ´Ù¼öÀÇ ¹ýÇÐ ¸®ºä ¹× Àú³Î¿¡ ¼ö·ÏµÈ ¸¹Àº ³í¹®ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù.
Åä¸Ó½º ½¦ÆÛ(Thomas L. Shaffer)
³ëÅ͵¥ÀÓ ·Î½ºÄðÀÇ ·Î¹öÆ® ¾Ø ¸Å¸®¾ð ¸í¿¹ ±³¼ö. Àú¼·Î´Â The Planning and Drafting of Wills and Trusts(1972; 2d ed., 1979; 3d ed., 1991, ij·Ñ ¾Ø ¹«´Ï¿Í °øÀú; 4th ed., 2001, ij·Ñ ¾Ø ¹«´Ï ¹× ¿¡ÀÌ¹Ì Á¶ ºÆÃ³¿Í °øÀú), On Being a Christian and a Lawyer: Law for the Innocent(1981), American Legal Ethics(1985), Faith and the Professions(1987), American Lawyers and Their Communities(1991, ¸¶¸® ½¦ÆÛ¿Í °øÀú), Lawyers, Clients, and Moral Responsibility(1994, ·Î¹öÆ® ÄÚÅ©¶õ°ú °øÀú) µîÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ ¿Ü¿¡µµ 250Æí ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¹ýÇÐ ¸®ºä¸¦ ½è´Ù.